Thursday, March 22, 2012

Ten Key Steps About The Shaklee Difference

There is so much information today about vitamins, supplements and drugs found in so many places that I want to take a minute to tell you why I believe that Shaklee supplements are the best in the marketplace today. Please check out the Ten Key Steps from Dr Jamie McManus below that was recently shared with Shaklee Distributors.  I believe these are critical when looking at supplementing your diet and making your home healthier for you and your loved ones.
~Cheryl.



Ten Key Steps that are taken to ensure that Shaklee supplements are the best in the marketplace:
1. Shaklee conducts over 100,000 tests annually to ensure the safety and efficacy of our products.
2. Each and every lot of Shaklee Products is 100% tested to ensure and guarantee that each and every ingredient that is part of our label claims is present in the appropriate amounts.
3. All ingredients in Shaklee products are qualified under the incredibly stringent Shaklee protocol, unique in the industry, which tests for up to 350 chemical contaminants, including pesticides, herbicides, heavy metals, solvent residues, etc.
4. Our Shaklee Scientists create formulations so that the key active ingredients are included at clinically efficacious levels, often significantly higher than many companies in the market.
5. Each product is formulated with nutritional ingredients that have been extensively studied to confirm safety and efficacy. Our products do not follow "fads," but incorporate scientific and/or epidemiologic evidence of need and benefit.
6. Shaklee employs advanced delivery systems to enhance bioavailability - and these systems are tested to confirm their nutrient delivery advantages.
7. All ingredients must be acceptable from the standpoint of the Shaklee philosophy, as well as detailed scrutiny as to their safety. We do not simply accept the Certificate of Analysis that many other companies accept, but rather retest for contaminants to confirm the Certificate of Analysis is accurate.
8. Shaklee has an unwavering commitment to avoid the use of artificial flavors, sweeteners, and added preservatives. We use only non-genetically modified soy protein.
9. Shaklee developed many of the standards and protocols for manufacturing that are now referred to as Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs).
10. Ongoing proof of our product performance is demonstrated by:
  • Over 100 scientific publications, 90-plus in peer-reviewed journals
  • The Landmark Study, the only study of its kind, which showed that people who took Shaklee supplements over a period of 20 years had markedly better health than both single-multivitamin and nonsupplement users
  • Shaklee products powering athletes to win 125 medals
  • Shaklee products fueling world explorers, 7 of Time-Life's "Greatest Adventures of All Time," and NASA Shuttle astronauts with a special rehydration product (called Astro-Ade)
Add to this list our accomplishments and awards in the area of environmental leadership and responsibility, and you will see why I am truly proud to be part of this company, where integrity, quality and social responsibility are our standards, and where making people and the planet healthier is our mission.
Shaklee is all about helping people take control of their future health by virtue of their choices today. My 16 years as a practicing family physician led me to believe even more strongly that prevention is where the future of medicine must go. Research confirms that nutrition, weight control, and wise supplementation can powerfully impact your vitality today and your health in the future, and I believe that we can redefine wellness in the coming years. Thank you for all that you are doing to share Shaklee products and the Shaklee Difference with so many. Together we are making a BIG difference in the health of the world!

Be well!
Dr Jamie McManus
Dr. Jamie McManus, MD, FAAFP
Chair of Medical Affairs, Health Sciences and Education for Shaklee Corporation

*************************************

 
CHANGING BRANDS CAN CHANGE YOUR LIFE! 
Check the flyer out at:

Friday, March 16, 2012

St Patty's Day

St Patrick's Day is coming very soon! This Dutch gal (me!) hasn't really paid a lot of attention to "St Patty's Day" in the past since it is mostly an "Irish thing"--other than wearing green to help celebrate the occasion. In researching this post, I found some interesting history and recipes.
St. Patrick's Day is celebrated on March 17, the saint's religious feast day and the anniversary of his death in the fifth century. The Irish have observed this day as a religious holiday for over 1,000 years. On St. Patrick's Day, which falls during the Christian season of Lent, Irish families would traditionally attend church in the morning and celebrate in the afternoon. Lenten prohibitions against the consumption of meat were waived and people would dance, drink and feast--on the traditional meal of Irish bacon and cabbage.

St Patrick's Day Symbols and Traditions

The Shamrock

The shamrock, which was also called the "seamroy" by the Celts, was a sacred plant in ancient Ireland because it symbolized the rebirth of spring. By the seventeenth century, the shamrock had become a symbol of emerging Irish nationalism. As the English began to seize Irish land and make laws against the use of the Irish language and the practice of Catholicism, many Irish began to wear the shamrock as a symbol of their pride in their heritage and their displeasure with English rule.

Another resource says the reason that the Shamrock is the National Flower of Ireland is... that St. Patrick used it to explain the Holy Trinity to the pagans.

Irish Music

Music is often associated with St. Patrick's Day—and Irish culture in general. From ancient days of the Celts, music has always been an important part of Irish life. The Celts had an oral culture, where religion, legend and history were passed from one generation to the next by way of stories and songs. After being conquered by the English, and forbidden to speak their own language, the Irish, like other oppressed peoples, turned to music to help them remember important events and hold on to their heritage and history. As it often stirred emotion and helped to galvanize people, music was outlawed by the English. During her reign, Queen Elizabeth I even decreed that all artists and pipers were to be arrested and hanged on the spot.
Today, traditional Irish bands like The Chieftains, the Clancy Brothers and Tommy Makem are gaining worldwide popularity. Their music is produced with instruments that have been used for centuries, including the fiddle, the uilleann pipes (a sort of elaborate bagpipe), the tin whistle (a sort of flute that is actually made of nickel-silver, brass or aluminum) and the bodhran (an ancient type of framedrum that was traditionally used in warfare rather than music).

The Snake

It has long been recounted that, during his mission in Ireland, St. Patrick once stood on a hilltop (which is now called Croagh Patrick), and with only a wooden staff by his side, banished all the snakes from Ireland.
In fact, the island nation was never home to any snakes. The "banishing of the snakes" was really a metaphor for the eradication of pagan ideology from Ireland and the triumph of Christianity. Within 200 years of Patrick's arrival, Ireland was completely Christianized.

Corned Beef

Each year, thousands of Irish Americans gather with their loved ones on St. Patrick's Day to share a "traditional" meal of corned beef and cabbage.
Though cabbage has long been an Irish food, corned beef only began to be associated with St. Patrick's Day at the turn of the century.
Irish immigrants living on New York City's Lower East Side substituted corned beef for their traditional dish of Irish bacon to save money. They learned about the cheaper alternative from their Jewish neighbors.

The Leprechaun

The original Irish name for these figures of folklore is "lobaircin," meaning "small-bodied fellow."
Belief in leprechauns probably stems from Celtic belief in fairies, tiny men and women who could use their magical powers to serve good or evil. In Celtic folktales, leprechauns were cranky souls, responsible for mending the shoes of the other fairies. Though only minor figures in Celtic folklore, leprechauns were known for their trickery, which they often used to protect their much-fabled treasure.
Leprechauns had nothing to do with St. Patrick or the celebration of St. Patrick's Day, a Catholic holy day. In 1959, Walt Disney released a film called Darby O'Gill & the Little People, which introduced America to a very different sort of leprechaun than the cantankerous little man of Irish folklore. This cheerful, friendly leprechaun is a purely American invention, but has quickly evolved into an easily recognizable symbol of both St. Patrick's Day and Ireland in general.


How are you going to celebrate this St. Patty’s Day?

Click here for St Patrick's Day CRAFT PROJECTS for your kids



Start your day with GOOD HEALTH...
Cinch Shamrock Shake!
Ingredients
  • 1 cup (handful) of green chard(yes, that’s right we said chard!)
  • 1/4 cup frozen or ½ C fresh strawberries
  • ½ (Half )medium banana
  • 12 oz cold water*
  • 2 scoops Shaklee Vanilla Cinch Shake Mix
Directions
...Blend all ingredients until creamy.
...Garnish with a fresh strawberry and drink up!

Nutrition Information
  • Makes 1 serving
  • Calories: 263
  • Carbohydrate: 43.5 g
  • Protein: 18 g
  • Fat: 3 g
Recipe Courtesy of Shaklee Director Rose Baca from Santa Fe, New Mexico


I'd love to see more recipes! Please share in the comments section.

Okay... one "St Patty's Day" joke here for ya! ... 
Q: How can you tell if an Irishman is having a good time?
A: He's Dublin over with laughter!

NOW GO HAVE A FUN DAY!!

RESOURCES:
http://www.st-patricks-day.com/about_saintpatrick.html

http://www.history.com/topics/st-patricks-day-symbols-and-traditions
http://www.enchantedlearning.com/crafts/stpatrick/

Friday, March 09, 2012

Great Stretches for Computer Users Necks, Shoulders and Backs

For those who spend a lot of time sitting at their computers.
Sitting at a computer for long periods often causes neck and
shoulder stiffness and occasionally lower back pain. Do these
stretches every hour or so throughout the day, or whenever you
feel stiff. Photocopy this and keep it in a drawer. Also, be sure
to get up and walk around the office whenever you think of it.
You’ll feel better!

If you are unable to view the image properly, download it
(right click and choose SaveAs) and have a look.

 
 
[Original post found on Facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/someamazingfacts in photos]
 
 
What is your favorite stretching technique?

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Heart Health!

Thank you to Dr Steve Chaney for today's timely healthy post!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Since today is Valentine's Day, it is only appropriate
that that I should focus on the heart.

I came across a very interesting study recently that
shows that when young women consumed a fish-rich diet
high in omega-3 fatty acids they were significantly
less likely to develop cardiovascular problems over the
next several years (M Strom et al, Hypertension, 59:
36-43, 2012).

The investigators analyzed the data from 49,000
pregnant Danish women between 15 and 49.

The women were asked about their dietary behaviors at
the time that they were enrolled into the Danish
National Health System database and at several
intervals over the next year.

The study then looked at hospital admissions for heart
related problems over the next 8 years and compared
that to the dietary intake of omega-3 fatty acids.

The results were striking!

When the investigators looked at the dietary intake of
omega-3-rich fish at the time of enrollment they found
that the group with the lowest omega-3 fatty acid
intake was almost twice as likely to develop
cardiovascular disease.

Of course, a single diet recall could be influenced by
many temporary factors, so the investigators
strengthened their analysis by obtaining dietary intake
data three different times over a 30-week period.

And when they compared those women who had consistently
low omega-3 intake with those who had consistently high
omega-3 intake the increase in cardiovascular risk was
almost three-fold!

So what is the bottom line for you?

1) This study is consistent with many other studies
showing that omega-3 fatty acids benefit the heart.

What makes this study unique is that it shows that the
heart health benefits of omega-3s occur even in young
women. Most of the previous studies have been done with
men and women who were over 50.

2) This study was done with young women, but there is
no reason not to expect the same benefit of omega-3s in
young men.

3) This study was only done with fish because very few
Danes take fish oil supplements, but other studies have
shown that fish and fish oil supplements have similar
heart health benefits.

So celebrate this Valentine's Day with a nice fish
dinner. Your heart will thank you!


To Your Health!
Dr. Stephen G Chaney

Monday, January 09, 2012

A 2012 Goal -- Improving Memory

One of my 2012 goals is to work on my memory. I am aging as a babyboomer and always looking for ways to age in a healthy way. My husband and I are going to Alaska this summer. This brings me to today's post. I have had trouble remembering the types of salmon that my husband likes to fish for because of all the nicknames. So I use this method and have found it to be helpful!  Enjoy!

Do you know there are five types of Pacific Northwest salmon species?: Chum, Sockeye, Coho, Chinook, and Pink Salmon. An easy mnemonic device, the five finger method, can help a person remember them all. 

How to Remember the Types of Pacific Northwest Salmon Species Using the 5 Finger Method

Instructions

Things You'll Need
  • 5 Fingers!
  1. Use the rhyming word thumb to remind you of the Chum salmon. Chums are the second most common salmon in the Pacific Northwest. Male Chum salmon are notable for their protruding front teeth.
  2. Point your index finger and gesture forward, as though you're about to "sock" someone in the eye. This is how you remember the Sockeye. Sockeyes have elongated, parabola-shaped mouths and more gill rakers than any other Pacific Northwest salmon. It feeds almost exclusively on plankton that it rakes from the river and ocean bottom.
  3. Your middle finger, or the "oh no" finger, will help you remember the Coho salmon. Because of the bright silver scales Coho develop in maturity, they are also sometimes referred to as Silver salmon.
  4. Form your index finger into a hook to remember the Chinook salmon. The index finger is also your ring finger, which can help you remember the common nickname of the Chinook: King salmon.
  5. The pinky finger can help you remember the Pink salmon, the most common salmon of the Pacific Northwest. Males are recognizable by the characteristic humps they develop on their backs, which is responsible for the nicknames "humpback salmon" or "humpies."

Do you use a variety of methods to help your memory?
Please share a couple in the comments below.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Rooney-isms

If you will take the time to read these, I promise you'll come away with an enlightened perspective. The subjects covered affect us all on a daily basis:

They're written by Andy Rooney, a man who has the gift of saying so much with so few words. Enjoy.......

I've learned
.... That the best classroom in the world is at the feet of an elderly person.

I've learned
.... That when you're in love, it shows.

I've learned
.... That just one person saying to me, "You've made my day!" makes my day.

I've learned
.... That having a child fall asleep in your arms is one of the most peaceful feelings in the world.

I've learned
.... That being kind is more important than being right.

I've learned
.... That you should never say no to a gift from a child.

I've learned
.... That I can always pray for someone when I don't have the strength to help him in some other way.

I've learned
.... That no matter how serious your life requires you to be, everyone needs a friend to act goofy with.

I've learned
.... That sometimes all a person needs is a hand to hold and a heart to understand.

I've learned
.... That simple walks with my father around the block on summer nights when I was a child did wonders for me as an adult.

I've learned
.... That life is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer it gets to the end, the faster it goes.

I've learned
.... That we should be glad God doesn't give us everything we ask for.

I've learned
.... That money doesn't buy class.

I've learned
.... That it's those small daily happenings that make life so spectacular.

I've learned.... That under everyone's hard shell is someone who wants to be appreciated and loved.

I've learned
.... That to ignore the facts does not change the facts.

I 've learned
.... That when you plan to get even with someone, you are only letting that person continue to hurt you.

I've learned
.... That love, not time, heals all wounds.

I've learned
.... That the easiest way for me to grow as a person is to surround myself with people smarter than I am.

I've learned
.... That everyone you meet deserves to be greeted with a smile.

I've learned
.... That no one is perfect until you fall in love with them.

I've learned
... That life is tough, but I'm tougher.

I've learned
.... That opportunities are never lost; someone will take the ones you miss.

I've learned
.... That when you harbor bitterness, happiness will dock elsewhere.

I've learned
.... That I wish I could have told my Mom that I love her one more time before she passed away.

I've learned
.... That one should keep his words both soft and tender, because tomorrow he may have to eat them.

I've learned
..... That a smile is an inexpensive way to improve your looks.

I've learned
..... That when your newly born grandchild holds your little finger in his little fist, that you're hooked for life.

I've learned
.... That everyone wants to live on top of the mountain, but all the happiness and growth occurs while you're climbing it.

I've learned
.... That the less time I have to work with, the more things I get done.



I'd love to hear what you have learned in your life. Please leave me a comment below.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Killer Vitamins? - Part 1 & 2

***************************************


I subscribe to online health tips from Dr Chaney.
I want to share his most recent post with you as
I believe we need to be as informed as possible
when making decisions regarding our health.

Healthy Blessings,
Cheryl.
***************************************


KILLER VITAMINS -- Part 1

A lot of you have been asking me about recent headlines
claiming that use of multivitamins and selected
vitamins or minerals may increase the risk of mortality
- and that supplemental calcium use may decrease
the risk of mortality.

Some of the headlines have gone as far to say that
vitamins can kill you.

What is the truth? Should you throw those vitamins
and minerals away, or are they safe for you to use?

The answer is -
some are and some aren't.

First let me start with a brief description of
the study and the results (Mursu et al, Archives of
Internal Medicine, 171: 1625-1633, 2011).

The data for this report were obtained from the
Iowa Women's Health Study. 38,722 older women (average age
61.6, range of ages = 55 to 69) were enrolled in the
study and followed for 19 years.

The women enrolled in the study filled out
extensive questionnaires in 1986, 1997 and 2004 that provided
information on their diet, lifestyle, health and
supplement intake.

The supplements evaluated on the questionnaire were
multivitamins and individual B complex, A, beta-
carotene, B6, folic acid, C, D, E, calcium,
copper, magnesium, selenium and zinc supplements. Supplements
like omega-3 fatty acids, probiotics and polyphenols
were not included in this study because their health
benefits were not recognized in 1986.

During the 19 years covered by the study, 15,594 of the
women (40.2%) died.

When the data were adjusted for age and calorie intake
use of B complex, C, D, E and calcium supplements were
associated with a slightly lower risk of death and
supplemental copper intake was associated with a
significantly higher risk of death than non-supplement
use.

When the data were further adjusted for medical
conditions and lifestyle differences between the
two groups at the time of entry into the study supplemental
calcium intake was associated with a decreased risk of
death, use of multivitamins and supplemental B6 or iron
were associated with a slight increased risk of
death and use of copper supplements was associated with a
significantly increased risk of death.

And when the data were even further adjusted
for dietary differences between the two groups,
supplemental calcium intake was still associated with a
decreased risk of death, use of multivitamins and
supplemtal B6, folic acid, magnesium, zinc or iron
were associated with a slight increased risk of death and
use of copper supplements was associated with a
significantly increased risk of death.

In analyzing any study like this the best place to
start is to analyze its strengths and weaknesses.

Its strengths are obvious. It is a very large study and
it followed people for a long time (19 years).

However, its weaknesses are many:

1) As the authors have admitted, it is an observational
study and does not prove cause and effect.

In non-scientific language, this means that this study
does not prove that vitamin use increases the risk of
death, only that it is associated with increased risk
of death under the particular conditions of
the study. Thus, it is important to carefully examine the
conditions of the study to see if there are confounding
factors that might have contributed to the results.

2) The data initially showed an increased risk of
death only associated with copper intake. It had to be
extensively massaged before any other adverse
associations became apparent.

3) The authors also observed that several of their
conclusions were not supported by previous studies.

Again, when you see this kind of discordance
between one study and several previous studies, further studies
should be performed to confirm or refute the results of
the study before recommendations are made to the
general public.

And when this kind of discordance arises, it is also
important to examine possible confounding
variables to see if there are some unique variables that may
have contributed to the results of the study.

In my opinion, there are at least two confounding
variables that merit further evaluation.

3a) While the vitamin users had slightly better diet
and lifestyle than the non-supplement users, those
differences were fairly small.

However, the use of estrogen hormone replacement
therapy was almost twice as prevalent in the supplement users
than the non-users. That is a concern because use of
hormone replacement therapy is known to be associated
with a significantly increased risk of death in this
population group.
Although an attempt was made to adjust for estrogen
use, Ithink that further studies are needed to see if
hormone replacement therapy has skewed the results of
this study.

3b) The percentage of women using supplements almost
doubled during the course of the study and the
"supplement group" included both the women using
supplements at the beginning of the study and the women
who started supplement use during the study.

As the authors noted this raises the possibility that
the supplemented group may have included a significant
number of women who started using supplements because
of medical conditions that arose during the study.

Ideally, the supplement using group and the non-
supplement using group should both be disease free at
the time supplement use was initiated if you are going
to have a valid comparison.

4) The sample size was extremely small (108-530) for
some of the groups where adverse effects were reported
- especially copper, vitamin B6 and folic acid.

5) The study only reported supplement use versus non-
use. It did not report the dosage of the individual
supplements used by the women in the study. This is
critical information, because both iron and copper
are known to be toxic - and magnesium and zinc have the
potential to be toxic - when used as stand-alone
supplements at high doses.

6) This brings me to my most important critique. This
study evaluated individual, probably high dose
supplements. This is a concern because individual
high dose supplements can cause harm by interfering with the
absorption of similar nutrients from food or multivitamins.

As an example, this study reported that use of
individual B6 or folic acid supplements were
associatedwith a higher risk of mortality, but a B complex
supplement containing B6 and folic acid (along with the
other B vitamins) had no effect on mortality.

Next week (see Killer Vitamins --Part 2 below) in part two of this series I will discuss
my "bottom line" recommendations for you based on an in-
depth analysis of this study's results and other pertinent literature.

##########################################################

KILLER VITAMINS -- Part 2

Last week I discussed the strengths and weaknesses of
the Iowa Women's Health Study (Mursu et al, Archives of
Internal Medicine, 171: 1625-1633, 2011) which has been
interpreted as suggesting that multivitamins and
certain individual vitamin or mineral supplements could
actually increase the risk of mortality in older women.

This week I'd like to focus on the bottom line for you,
and give you my personal recommendations.

1) As I mentioned last week the sample size for women
taking a copper-only supplement was exceedingly small
(108), so I do not have much confidence in the data
reported for copper supplement users in this study.

However, high doses of copper can be toxic and there is
no reason to be taking a stand-alone copper supplement
unless it is recommended by your physician.

On the other hand, copper is an essential nutrient, so
some copper should be included in your multivitamins. I
recommend looking for multivitamins providing around 1
mg of copper (50% of the DV) on a daily basis.

2) The potential toxicity of iron in adult men and
post-menopausal women is well documented. About 5-10%
of these population groups have an increased need for
iron that can be easily diagnosed by their physicians.
There is another 10-15% that have a genetic condition
that can lead to iron overload and premature death.
This condition is insidious and is often not diagnosed
until considerable damage has been done. For the rest
of the people in these population groups iron offers
neither a risk nor a benefit.

This is why the standard recommendation for adult men
and post-menopausal women is to avoid iron supplements
and iron-containing multivitamins unless supplemental
iron is specifically recommended by their physicians.

To be quite clear, if you are an adult man or post-
menopausal woman there is no reason to be taking an
iron-containing supplement unless it has been
recommended by your physician.

3) The potential toxicity of vitamin B6 and folic acid
as stand-alone supplements in this study was quite
small and was not seen in several previous studies.
However, as I pointed out last week there was no risk
involved in taking a B complex supplement containing
B6 and folic acid.

This reinforces a continuing theme of mine - namely
that we should be focusing on a holistic, balanced
approach to supplementation rather than relying on
supplements providing individual, high potency
nutrients.

4) Similarly, the potential toxicity of magnesium and
zinc was also quite small, was seen only after
considerable adjustment of the primary data, and has
not been seen in several previous studies.

My recommendation would be to get both of these
nutrients from a well-designed multivitamin supplement
where all of the essential minerals are provided in the
appropriate amounts and balance. If you do use
magnesium and zinc as stand-alone supplements my
recommendation would be to avoid very high doses of
either unless directed by your physician.

5) The very slight increase in mortality associated
with multivitamin use is not completely surprising
because some previous studies have suggested this
posiblity.

As last week one needs to know why the participants
were taking a multivitamin (ie, was it because they had
a medical condition) to appropriately evaluate these
data.

However, it is also important to ask how well designed
and tested the multivitamin was. There are some
multivitamins in the marketplace that are so poorly
designed and/or manufactured that they could possibly
cause more harm than good. Here are the questions
that you should ask about the supplement that you are
using:

- Does it represent a holistic approach to
supplementation?

I have already talked about the value of having all of
the B vitamins in balance rather than high dose B6 or
folic acid alone. However, both pure alpha tocopherol
alone (even all natural d-alpha tocopherol) or pure
beta- carotene alone have the potential to cause some
harm by interfering with the absorption of similar
nutrients.

You should look for a supplement that provides all of
the naturally occurring tocopherols and tocotrienols -
especially gamma-, beta- and delta tocopherol rather
than pure d-alpha-tocopherol alone.

You should also look for a supplement that provides all
of the major carotenoids (beta-carotene, alpha-
carotene, lycopene, lutein, and zeaxanthin) rather than
beta-carotene alone.

And finally, a truly holistic supplement will contain
omega-3 fatty acids, polyphenols and probiotics.

- Does the manufacturer do quality controls that
guarantee the supplement does not contain contaminants
that can harm you? Ask them how many quality controls
they perform with the product that you are using.

- Can the supplement manufacturer provide you with
clinical studies done with their product showing that
it delivers the nutrients to your bloodstream and has
the intended effect in your body? Animal and cell
culture studies don't count.

- Are there clinical studies showing that long term use
of the supplement actually decreases disease risk? The
study should be at least as long as the Iowa Women's
Health Study (19 years).

6) Finally, we should not ignore the "good news" part
of the study - namely that calcium supplementation
decreased mortality risk. Of course, this conclusion is
subject to the same limitations as the previous ones
and not every previous study has come to the same
conclusion.

The DV for calcium for women in this age range is 1,200
mg/day and some 40-60% of older women do not achieve
this from diet alone. I recommend that everyone strive
for the DV for calcium from diet plus supplementation.
Intakes slightly above 1,200 mg/day are probably safe
for older women, but I don't recommend going above
2,000 mg/day.

I've covered a lot of ground over the past two weeks.
Let me close with a quick summary.

- The Iowa Women's Health Study has a number of
significant design flaws and its conclusions should be
confirmed by subsequent studies before recommendations
are made to the public.

- The study's warning against taking iron-containing
supplements and copper-alone supplements is, however,
right on. In postmenopausal women these supplements
should only be taken if prescribed by a doctor.

- Individual high dose B6 or folic acid supplements are
also probably not a good idea unless prescribed by a
physician, but a well designed B complex or
multivitamin supplement containing those nutrients
appears to be safe.

- The risk associated with individual high dose
magnesium and zinc is weak and needs to be confirmed by
additional studies. Holistic supplements containing
magnesium and zinc should not be a problem.

- The risk associated with multivitamin use was also
weak and needs to be confirmed. My take on this is that
many of the multivitamins on the market are poorly
designed and could conceivable cause more harm than
good. I recommend looking for holistic supplements
backed by strong clinical studies showing that they are
safe and effective for long term use.

- This study suggests that supplemental calcium may
decrease the risk of death. While this needs to be
confirmed by subsequent studies, it does make sense to
make sure that you are getting the DV for calcium on a
daily basis.






To Your Health!
Dr. Stephen G Chaney
Shaklee Master Coordinator

*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food
and Drug Administration. This information is not
intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent
any disease.

****ABOUT DR CHANEY:
Dr. Stephen Chaney, Phd

Dr. Chaney has a BS in Chemistry from Duke University
and a PhD in Biochemistry from UCLA. He currently holds
the rank of Professor at a major university.


Dr. Chaney has taught biochemistry to medical and dental
students for more than 30 years and has won several awards
for teaching excellence.


He runs an active cancer research program and has published
over 100 scientific articles and reviews in peer-reviewed scientific
journals. He has also written two chapters on nutrition for a
popular medical biochemistry textbook.


Dr. Chaney and his wife have also built a business part time that
has earned them a 6 -figure income for the past 15 years and he
has spent the last 10 years teaching other people how to do the same.


[If you want more information about Shaklee supplements,
please check out my website at www.babyboomerhealth.myshaklee.com]

Saturday, August 27, 2011

How to Freeze Peaches

Today is a good day. Today is the day I am going to help out my dad and freeze Red Haven peaches. They are our favorite tasting peach--and it started in Michigan! Here's a brief history. The Red Haven was introduced in 1940. It was created by Dr. Stanley Johnston of Michigan State University. It was first grown in South Haven, Michigan. There is a park in South Haven that bears Stanley’s name. His “Haven” series of peaches had a major effect on the peach business in the eastern part of the country.

Today is special. I might just eat a fresh peach (or two?) before the rest go into freezer bags. Yum! Next I anticipate taking a bag of peaches out of the freezer when Michigan fresh fruit is a thing of the past--February in Michigan--and savor a little taste of late summer peaches. Oh yeah!

The following article is from another blog post that gives great instructions as to freezing peaches.

***

Freezing Fresh Peaches

It is a pretty simple thing to put up fruit in the freezer. You save some money and have the taste of summer all year long. We used to can peaches, then we progressed to freezing them in syrup and finally over the year we perfected this really simple way to freeze peaches.

The most important thing to do is to start with a good peach. They should be freestone peaches and be ripe, but not soft. They should also have a skin that peels easily without having to blanch the fruit. The peaches we get are Red Haven peaches. This is the variety that we like to use for freezing and it always produces a great result.

The most labor intensive part of the process is the peeling and slicing. I make a slice around the seam of the peach and pull the skin off starting with the peach. If the peach is of proper ripeness the skin should pull off without having to cut off any of the flesh. After peeling, I cut slices off the stone. Next you need to treat the peaches with Ascorbic Acid so they don't go brown. I use Fruit Fresh, but I don't follow the proportions on the label as they use too much sugar in my opinion. Finally you need to pack you fruit in sugar.

Recipe for Freezing Fresh Peaches

8 quarts of skinned and sliced fresh ripe peaches
8 quart freezer bags
8 T Fruit Fresh
4 C sugar

Divide the peaches among the bags making sure to leave some head room. Mix 1 T of fruit fresh and 1/2 of sugar into each bag. Stir the fruit and sugar mixture in the bag. Allow to sit for 15 minute or so until some juice forms. Seal bags and place them in the freezer.

I love to eat these peaches all by themselves or over vanilla ice cream. You can also use a quart for the filling for a pie or a peach cobbler.

Enjoy!

[Taken from http://househubbie.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-freeze-fresh-peaches.html]
***

I would love to read your favorite peach recipe.
Please leave me a comment.
Now that would just be peachy!

Thursday, August 25, 2011

The best six doctors anywhere



The best six doctors anywhere
And no one can deny it
Are sunshine, water,
rest
, and air
Exercise and diet.


These six will gladly you attend
If only you are willing
Your mind they'll ease
Your will they'll mend
And charge you not a shilling.


~Nursery rhyme quoted by Wayne Fields, What the River Knows, 1990

Saturday, May 28, 2011

The Meaning of Memorial Day

The following was shared by Tom DeVries, Lead Pastor of Fair Haven Ministries in Hudsonville, MI. He received it from his friend, Mike Atkinson.

As we move toward Memorial Weekend, and look to think, thank, and remember veterans this weekend, Tom shares a story from Mike (the father of a Marine), which I believe will touch your heart and help you reflect on what Monday means to us as Americans. It may be a little long, but worth the read. I'm sure there are some that roll their eyes about this holiday, others that find meaning only as the official start of summer, but for others the meaning of this day is special, and even more, personal.

As you reflect on Memorial Day, may you be reminded that for all, God has truly shed His grace on thee.


CEMETERY WATCHMAN

I just wanted to get the day over with and go down to Smokey's. Sneaking a look at my watch I saw the time - 1655. Five minutes to go before the cemetery gates are closed for the day. Full dress was hot in the August sun. Oklahoma summertime was as bad as ever - the heat and humidity at the same level - both too high.

I saw the car pull into the drive - a '69 or '70 model Cadillac Deville, looked factory-new. It pulled into the parking lot at a snail's pace. An old woman got out so slowly I thought she was paralyzed; she had a cane and a sheaf of flowers - about four or five bunches as best I could tell.

I couldn't help myself. The thought came unwanted, and left a slightly bitter taste: 'She's gonna spend an hour, and for this old Marine, my hip hurts and I'm ready to get out of here right now!' But for this day, my duty was to assist anyone coming in.

Kevin would lock the In gate and if I could hurry the old biddy along, we might make it to Smokey's in time.

I broke post attention. My hip made gritty noises when I took the first step and the pain went up a notch. I must have made a real military sight: middle-aged man with a small pot gut and half a limp, in Marine full-dress uniform, which had lost its razor crease about thirty minutes after I began the watch at the cemetery.

I stopped in front of her, halfway up the walk. She looked up at me with an old woman's squint.

"Ma'am, may I assist you in any way?"

She took long enough to answer.

"Yes, son. Can you please carry these flowers? I seem to be moving a tad slow these days."

"My pleasure, ma'am." Well, it wasn't TOO much of a lie.

She looked again. "Marine, where were you stationed?"

"Vietnam, ma'am. Ground-pounder. '69 to '71."

She looked at me closer. "Wounded in action, I see. Well done, Marine. I'll be as quick as I can."

I lied a little bigger: "No hurry, ma'am."

She smiled and winked at me. "Son, I'm 85-years-old and I can tell a lie from a long way off. Let's get this done. Might be the last time I can do this. My name's Joanne Wieserman, and I've a few Marines I'd like to see one more time."

"Yes, ma 'am. At your service."

She headed for the World War I section, stopping at a stone. She picked one of the flowers out of my arm and laid it on top of the stone. She murmured something I couldn't quite make out. The name on the marble was Donald S. Davidson, USMC: France 1918.

She turned away and made a straight line for the World War II section, stopping at one stone. I saw a tear slowly tracking its way down her cheek. She put a bunch on a stone; the name was Stephen X. Davidson, USMC, 1943.

She went up the row a ways and laid another bunch on a stone, Stanley J. Wieserman, USMC, 1944.

She paused for a second. "Two more, son, and we'll be done."

I almost didn't say anything, but, "Yes, ma'am. Take your time."

She looked confused. "Where's the Vietnam section, son? I seem to have lost my way."

I pointed with my chin. "That way, ma'am."

"Oh!", she chuckled quietly. "Son, me and old age ain't too friendly."

She headed down the walk I'd pointed at. She stopped at a couple of stones before she found the ones she wanted. She placed a bunch on Larry Wieserman, USMC, 1968, and the last on Darrel Wieserman, USMC, 1970. She stood there and murmured a few words I still couldn't make out.

"OK, son, I'm finished. Get me back to my car and you can go home."

"Yes, ma'am. If I may ask, were those your kinfolk?"

She paused. "Yes, Donald Davidson was my father, Stephen was my uncle, Stanley was my husband, Larry and Darrel were our sons. All killed in action. All Marines."

She stopped. Whether she had finished, or couldn't finish, I don't know. She made her way to her car, slowly and painfully.

I waited for a polite distance to come between us and then double-timed it over to Kevin, waiting by the car.

"Get to the Out gate quick! I have something I've got to do."

Kevin started to say something, but saw the look I gave him. He broke the rules to get us there down the service road. We beat her. She hadn't made it around the rotunda yet.

"Kevin, stand at attention next to the gatepost. Follow my lead." I humped it across the drive to the other post.

When the Cadillac came puttering around from the hedges and began the short straight traverse to the gate, I called in my best gunny's voice: "TehenHut! Present haaaarms!"

I have to hand it to Kevin; he never blinked an eye - full dress attention and a salute that would make his Drill Instructor proud.

She drove through that gate with two old, worn-out Marines giving her a send-off she deserved, for service rendered to her country, and for knowing duty, honor and sacrifice.

I am not sure, but I think I saw a salute returned from that Cadillac.

[forwarded by Ken Davis, the proud son of a war hero]